Moving toward standard APIs

For my current client I am involved in the process of creating a list with allowed, deprecated and blacklisted frameworks and dependencies. I`ve noticed that there are a lot of internal projects that copy dependencies and framework choices from previous projects and are therefore using old and deprecated libraries. We are trying very hard to get projects to use standard APIs and get rid of the old stuff.

Frameworks like Spring, Google Guice, Seam, etc, are also moving toward standard APIs. Spring 3.0 embraces a lot of standards APIs like JSR303, JSR330, JSR317, which in my opinion is a good thing!

Why move to these new APIs?

It allows developers to focus on one API instead of learning a specific API for each framework. Switch or to other/competing frameworks or upgrading becomes easier. For example, the gap between Spring 3 and Java EE 6 (CDI + EJB3) has become much smaller due to these new standards. A good example were standardisation helps is the JSR 303 Bean Validation API which is supported by both Spring, Hibernate/JPA, JSF, etc.

Springmodules validation

In Spring 3 the JSR 303 Beans Validation API support was introduced which effectively replaces the springmodules validation project. Users of Spring 3 are encouraged to use this new JSR 303 Beans Validation API.

More information

When you want to leverage the standard API in your project, please have a look at the following articles:

Spring Dependency Injection annotations

Spring and Google have been working on a standardisation for Dependency Injection annotations, result: the JSR 330 specification. This is a standard API for doing annotation based dependency injection. Spring supports this API since Spring 3.0 (

More information

Have a look at the following articles:

Hibernate vs Java Persistence API

The Java Persistence API (JPA) was introduced as part of the Java EE 5 and EJB 3 specification. JPA is in a way the formalisation of Hibernate in a Java Specification (JSR). Since the makers of Hibernate were actively involved in this specification there are numberous of simularities between Hibernate and JPA.

Differences between Hibernate and JPA

JPA defines the standard API for using persistence in Java. You can use Hibernate as a JPA implementation. When using JPA developers can leverage the power of a standardised persistence API and still being able to use Hibernate specific functionality if required. But it opens up possibilities to move to EclipseLink or some other JPA implementation.

Hibernate 3.5 – JPA 2.0

In Hibernate 3.5 a lot of Hibernate subprojects have been merged back into the Hibernate core. This makes it easier to configure and use JPA in conjunction with Hibernate. The JSR 303 API was not officially included as a requirement for JPA 2.0 but Hibernate integrates nicely with the validation specification.


There are a lot of examples that demonstrate the benefits of using standard JSR APIs whenever possible. I would advice to use standard APIs whenever possible and only use specific framework functionality when the standards do not provide enough functionality.

Comments are closed.